Body armor and helmets that have been the flawed dimension. Bright orange life jackets which are of little use for tactical models that require camouflage. Vehicles that accomplice nations would not have the components to take care of. These are simply a few of the points which have plagued the Pentagon’s multibillion-dollar Global Train and Equip program, which bankrolls coaching, provides and weapons to militaries of overseas nations, in line with a brand new report from the Government Accountability Office. With $four.1 billion allotted to this system from 2009 to 2017, it’s the United States’ third-largest security-assistance effort — behind those who fund the combat towards ISIS in Iraq and Syria and the Taliban in Afghanistan. The Pentagon considers these partnerships important to its international counterinsurgency efforts, however the G.A.O. discovered that solely eight of 21 tasks evaluated in 2016 and 2017 confirmed improved capabilities within the native navy forces that the packages are supposed to assist.
The Global Train and Equip program was first licensed below the 2006 protection invoice to construct the capability of accomplice nations to combat terrorist threats overseas. But poor mission designs, procurement and tools points and work-force-management failures have restricted its capability to assist the militaries of accomplice nations to successfully combat terrorist teams on their very own turf, in line with the G.A.O.
Part of the issue has to do with the best way the Defense Department decides what the cash ought to accomplish and the way. Colby Goodman, the director of the Security Assistance Monitor, a Washington assume tank, famous that the G.A.O. report calls consideration to the obscure nature of the United States’ targets in coaching and equipping every nation. “What are the short-term and medium-term goals, and how do we think we can achieve that?” Goodman mentioned. “We don’t have anything that says, ‘Here exactly is the strategy, and here are the indicators that they’re trying to achieve.’” He added that the report exhibits a Pentagon deal with terrorist teams, like Boko Haram in West Africa and the Shabab in East Africa, however for all the cash being allotted, these militants have restricted capability to hurt the United States. “There’s not a lot of evidence that these groups are threatening the homeland, but they for sure can threaten U.S. Embassies and U.S. interests in these countries,” Goodman mentioned. With extra readability concerning the true nature of the threats on the bottom, assist packages may very well be subjected to a extra stringent evaluation of prices and advantages.
The G.A.O. reported navy unit in a single unnamed African nation was capable of plan and execute operations towards Boko Haram however discovered no proof that it performed “more than a minor role” in operations concentrating on the group. Elsewhere, one other unit that acquired assist was discovered to have firearms in such unhealthy form that their barrels had warped. Goodman mentioned the Pentagon is below stress to spend cash on these help packages, however there may be nonetheless a necessity for “more transparency on what the goals are and what the strategies are, not only for the U.S. but for the other countries as well.”
An essential challenge not lined by the federal government watchdog, Goodman famous, is the issue of presidency corruption and the theft or diversion of funds, which have sophisticated American navy assist efforts in lots of nations, together with Iraq, Afghanistan, Mali and Yemen. “All of those corruption-related risks are still present in a good portion of the countries that we’re providing with D.O.D. Train and Equip funds,” Goodman mentioned. “So it would be foolish to not think we’re going to continue to experience these challenges.” In locations the place corruption is a widespread and chronic drawback, Goodman prompt that the United States ought to contemplate putting tighter restrictions and situations on the help it offers. In some locations, he added, it would even be smart to curtail sure assist packages.
Greg Pollock, the appearing deputy assistant secretary of protection for safety cooperation, mentioned his workplace is taking the issues highlighted within the report “very seriously.” Johnny Michael, a spokesman for the Defense Department, added that the division is already addressing lots of the issues that have been talked about.
“We’re doing things very differently today, and the G.A.O. report doesn’t capture that,” Pollock mentioned. “We’re now forcing the planners to articulate their objectives very concretely upfront, to essentially articulate their theory of change about how we’re going to go from Point A to Point B with a partner.” He added that the primary goal of safety help is to empower “allies and partners to take on shared threats, either in lieu of U.S. forces or alongside U.S. forces in coalition, and to minimize the direct risk to U.S. personnel.” But some counterterror missions nonetheless require American troops to enter hurt’s approach, generally with deadly outcomes. Niger, the place 4 American troopers were killed on a mission with native forces in an ambush by Islamic State-linked insurgents final October, acquired greater than $82 million by the Global Train and Equip program in 2016 and 2017. And Somalia, the place a Navy SEAL was killed a yr in the past in an operation towards a Shabab goal and the place a firefight killed one soldier and wounded 4 others on June eight, acquired $52 million in assist over the identical interval.
Pollock mentioned the Defense Department is “working day in and day out to ensure that we have the right mechanisms to prioritize resources to the right partners.” As for accomplice nations that aren’t prepared to repair issues like those recognized within the G.A.O. report, Pollock added, “that’s a partner that we should not be investing in.”