I can scent Donald Trump’s concern from right here. His panic. His nervousness.
And but, I don’t have a full image of what’s inflicting it.
The solely individuals who know what has been found within the Russian election meddling probe are Special Counsel Robert Mueller and his crew, and so they aren’t speaking.
But President Trump little doubt is aware of way more about it than the remainder of us, and what he is aware of — or what he fears — seems to be a consuming preoccupation. He tweets concerning the investigation consistently.
Part of that is an overt play to bend public opinion, to besmirch no matter conclusions the investigation may attain and to keep at bay any try at a doable impeachment.
As The New York Times reported final week concerning the president and his authorized crew:
“They have come to believe that, if the Democrats win control of the House in November, the chamber will vote on whether to begin the impeachment process no matter the outcome of Mr. Mueller’s investigation. So they want to sway Americans — and by extension, lawmakers.”
The Times quoted Rudy Giuliani, one of many president’s attorneys, as saying, “Nobody is going to consider impeachment if public opinion has concluded this is an unfair investigation, and that’s why public opinion is so important.”
Politico reported on this technique in May, writing: “President Donald Trump and his lawyers have made a strategic calculation that their fight against Special Counsel Robert Mueller is more political than it is legal. They’re banking that the lead Russia investigator will follow longstanding Justice Department practice that a sitting president can’t be indicted, and that the only real threat to Trump’s survival is impeachment.”
“So long as that theory holds, Trump’s plan is to forcefully challenge Mueller in the arena he knows best — not the courtroom but the media, with a public campaign aimed at the special counsel’s credibility, especially among Republican voters and G.O.P. members of Congress.”
In May, CNN’s Dana Bash interviewed Giuliani, and he or she posited that the “Spygate” saga was “an intentional strategy to undermine the investigation, knowing that they, the investigators, the special counsel, it’s their policy not to talk. But you are very free to and are very aggressive about doing so.”
Giuliani responded partially:
“Of course, we have to do it in defending the president. We are defending — to a large extent, remember, Dana, we are defending here, it is for public opinion, because eventually the decision here is going to be impeach, not impeach. Members of Congress, Democrat and Republican, are going to be informed a lot by their constituents. So, our jury is the American — as it should be — is the American people.”
Yes, there’s some impeachment fervor on the left, some that celebration leaders have tried to tamp down, fervor even upfront of Mueller’s findings. But there additionally seems to be very actual impeachment concern within the Trump interior circle.
One has to ask: Why precisely is impeachment entrance of thoughts for these folks? If they had been as harmless as they publicly proclaim, they might know that impeachment can be out of the query as a matter of reality and regulation. But that’s apparently not the case.
Do they consider that Democrats would take the politically disastrous step of shifting to question Trump even when Mueller totally exonerated him?
I don’t consider so. I consider that Trump is conducting himself as solely a responsible man would, one who has a really actual and well-founded concern that he’s in imminent jeopardy.
He is girding for the combat.
In May, Trump added Emmet T. Flood, a lawyer who represented Bill Clinton throughout his impeachment, to his authorized crew.
And in May 2017, CNN reported: “White House lawyers have begun researching impeachment procedures in an effort to prepare for what officials still believe is a distant possibility that President Donald Trump could have to fend off attempts to remove him from office, two people briefed on the discussions tell CNN.”
Impeachment is all the time on Trump’s thoughts, and so he relentlessly pursues his technique of making a local weather of incredulity to ward it off.
Just on Saturday, he tweeted: “Public opinion has turned strongly against the Rigged Witch Hunt and the ‘Special’ Counsel because the public understands that there was no Collusion with Russia (so ridiculous), that the two FBI lovers were a fraud against our Nation & that the only Collusion was with the Dems!”
But that technique of discrediting the investigation appears to be working virtually completely amongst Trump’s base. As CNN reported in May about “a slight negative shift overall” in public approval of Mueller’s dealing with of the investigation:
“Just about all of that change has come from Republicans, who now give Mueller a 17 percent approval rating, down from 29 percent in March. Among Democrats and independents, approval ratings for Mueller have not changed significantly.”
Trump has executed and mentioned many heinous issues as president and earlier than, however it’s extremely unlikely that any can be strong floor for a profitable impeachment. However, damning findings from Mueller would create that strong floor.
Yet Trump contends that there’s no there there. If not, why is he performing like there’s?